Bolch Judicial Institute
Bolch Judicial Institute
Materials
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Materials

Password Protected Solely for Conference-Registrants’ Use; Materials Will Be Publicly Available After Conference (Conference registrants may access materials via the following link: Proportionality Materials for Registrants)

SURVEY RESULTS ON EXPERIENCE WITH 2015 RULE AMENDMENTS

  • Three Surveys of Local Bench-Bar, Special-Focus Groups Who Met in Dallas (May 5, 2017), San Francisco (December 8, 2017), and Washington DC (July 13, 2018) Duke Bolch Judicial Institute
  • Survey of Members of Seven National Bar Organizations, Duke Bolch Judicial Institute (January 2019)
  • Survey Replicating 2009 Federal Judicial Center Closed-Case Discovery-Cost Survey, Duke Bolch Judicial Institute (April 2019)
  • Survey of 250 Federal Judges on Discovery Practices, Exterro/Duke/EDRM (January 2019)
    • Exterro’s Key Takeaways of the Judges Survey, Exterro (January 2019)
    • ACEDS Blog Post Series: Part 1, Failure to Comply with Federal Rules, George Socha (April 1, 2019)
    • ACEDS Blog Post Series: Part 2, Taking Affirmative Action to Address E-Discovery Problems, George Socha (April 12, 2019)

DISCOVERY COSTS DATA

  • Data Provided by In-House Corporate Counsel

OTHER MATERIALS

  • Implementing the 2015 Discovery Amendments to Achieve Proportionality (Second Edition 2018)
  • Technology Assisted Review (TAR) Guidelines, EDRM/Duke Law (January 2019)
  • Draft TAR Protocol, Bolch Judicial Institute (April 2019)